| Social
Norms Media Campaigns
The Theory:
As defined by the National
Social Norms Resource Center, social norms are "the perceived
standards of acceptable attitudes and behaviors prevalent among
the members of a community." In 1986, Dr. Wes Perkins and Dr.
Alan Berkowitz of Hobart and William Smith Colleges applied the
theory of the effect of normative perceptions to college drinking.
They found that students overestimate the frequency and quantity
of college drinking and that the overestimation and misperception
correlated with higher-risk drinking behaviors.
The Implementation:
In 1989, Northern
Illinois University was the first college to develop an advertising
campaign for its campus based on this theory. By promoting the norms
of college student drinking through ads in the campus newspaper,
the goal was to reduce the misperceptions students held and test
whether drinking behaviors would be affected. The campaign demonstrated
measurable results in reductions in high-risk drinking and other
college campuses soon followed.
In the 1999-2000 academic year, Penn began
pursuing an expanded social norms media campaign, utilizing newly
collected data and fresh designs. The advertisements are placed
in the Daily Pennsylvanian, on posters, and on magnets. While some
schools have expanded their campaigns to include messages regarding
sexual health, tobacco, violence, etc., Penn has devoted its resources
to one health issue negatively impacting students with a great deal
of ferocity - alcohol.
What is important to keep in mind when viewing
social norms ads is that the intent of the information is twofold:
to provide facts that correct a misperception and to give the viewer
a healthy norm to strive for via a positive behavior change. It
is natural for students to view the ads with skepticism; after all,
they hold a deeply seeded misperception about what college drinking
appears to be. It is hard to change that misperception without allowing
the community to challenge the new information and reexamine ingrained
misperceptions.
Successes of This Approach:
Social norms marketing approaches are still
relatively new in college health. Schools that have been utilizing
this approach for several years are disseminating their successes.
College health practitioners are striving to achieve consistency
in the approach so that evaluations can be understood in the context
of one another. However, each college campaign differs in message,
dissemination method, and individual college environment, so the
challenge remains in determining successes across the board. Several
studies are underway to develop consistent campaigns and compare
outcomes to control schools. Below is a brief table with reported
successes of this approach at select schools:
| Intervention
Site
|
Reduction:
Heavy Episodic Alcohol
Consumption |
| Northern Illinois
University |
44% over 10
years |
| University of
Arizona |
28% over 5 years |
| Hobart &
William Smith Colleges |
40% over 4 years |
| Western Washington
University |
20% over 3 years |
| University of
Missouri |
21% over 2 years |
| DCP SAFE (H.S.
Students) |
14% over 2 years |
| Santa Clara
University |
20% over 1 year |
| SUNY-New Paltz |
21% over 4 years |
{taken from the National Social Norms Resource
Center website}
Recent Press on Social Norms Approaches
USA Today {5.28.2002}
http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2002-05-28-social-norming.htm
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
(NIAAA) Task Force Report on College Drinking
http://www.collegedrinkingprevention.gov/
New York Times {12.09.01}
http://www.socialnorm.org/nytimes12.9.01.html
Time Magazine {06.18.01}
http://www.socialnorm.org/time.html
Your Thoughts
Your thoughts are important to us. If you would like to give feedback
on the social norms theory, implementation of the campaign, or specific
advertisements, please feel free to email Stephanie Ives, Director of the Office of Alcohol & Other Drug Program Initiatives, at: ivess@pobox.upenn.edu
Click on image for larger version
| The 2003-2004 Penn
Campaign |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The 2002-2003 Penn
Campaign |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2001-2002 Campaign |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 2000-2001 Campaign |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|