Make this page printable.

Search by course code
Search by professor/TA


What is the Penn Course Review?

Help for First Time Visitors to the PCR

Everything on this website is accessible via the navigation panel on the left side of every page on this site. You can use either the search box or the browse menu.

If you use the search box, make sure you click the appropriate radio button below the search box.

If you choose "Search by course code" and a course is found, you will be brought directly to that course's ratings page. The proper format when searching by course code is department code followed by course number (e.g. CSE 120).

If you choose "Search by professor/TA," a list of all professors or TAs whose name contains the entered text will be returned. It's a matter of preference, but you may find the "Browse courses By Professor/TA" option (described below) to be more useful.

Below the search box, you will find the Browse courses menu. We will describe the choices under the Browse courses menu below.

If you choose Browse courses "By Department," a list of all departments will be returned. If you then click on a department name, you will go to the ratings page for all courses in that department. Initially, courses from all semesters are returned. You can use the "Limit results to a specific semester" drop-down list to limit the results to a specific semester. Courses are initially sorted by course code. However, you can choose to sort the courses by any column by clicking on the column heading. For example, clicking on the "Course" column heading will sort the courses from highest-rated course to lowest-rated course. If you click a course's course code link, you will go to that course's ratings page. If you click a lecturer's name link, you will go to that lecturer's ratings page.

If you choose Browse courses "Across the University," you will be able to view the highest and lowest rated courses, the highest and lowest rated lecturers, and the least and most difficult courses across the university. The ratings on each of those pages can be sorted by clicking on a column heading. These pages are analogous to the "Hall of Fame" and "Hall of Shame" sections in the old Penn Course Review book.

If you choose Browse courses "By Professor/TA," you will be able to view a list of all lecturers whose last name begins will a specific letter. You can then click on a lecturer's name to view that lecturer's ratings page.

General Overview

The Penn Course Review is a student-run publication that lists the numerical ratings and general comments for all undergraduate courses taught in an academic year at the University of Pennsylvania. As an educational resource that publicizes student feedback, PCR has a long history of being a valuable and influential guide for course selection. Right now the review is being revived after two years of having an uncertain future; the last paper copy was published in 2001, and a previous online edition was discontinued after its domain name expired in July of 2003. Our hope is that this website picks up where the previous edition left off, and continues to provide students with an informative, accurate, and entertaining appraisal of classes at Penn.

A number of functions that were not possible in the book form of the Penn Course Review are now possible online. On this website you will find browsable listings of courses from the 2002-2003 school year arranged by department as well as by professor. You can search for courses by registrar course code, course title, or professor or TA’s name using the search bar on the left. As time goes by, courses offered in successive semesters will be added, resulting in a comprehensive guide that allows students to compare the same course across different years and different teachers. Individual webpages display the composite course evaluation statistics, and the “Across the University” feature displays the time-honored tradition of listing notable courses and professors. As in the print editions, course ratings, instructor ratings, and difficulty level ratings are all measured on a scale from 0.00 to 4.00. (Click here to find out more about what the numbers mean.)

Although a substantial amount of work has been done, this website is still far from complete. Written reviews, in some ways the most helpful guides to what students thought of their courses, will be added incrementally throughout the rest of the school year. As you browse through this site, know that cross-listed courses are listed only under one department. Also, “topics” courses, such as 200-level History major seminars and Pilot Curriculum general requirement courses, are not differentiated in their course titles.

We hope that the Penn Course Review website proves helpful to all students—whether you’re choosing courses for Advance Registration or tentatively planning out courses for the rest of your college career. Feel free to submit feedback about this website or questions about our organization. Finally, remember that you can also consult advisors, professors, and fellow students for course advice and recommendations. Enjoy, and good luck!

The PCR Board

Explanation of the Ratings on the Course Review Website

The University of Pennsylvania course evaluation forms have 7 questions that students rate on a scale of Poor to Excellent. The top two questions, which ask for each student's "Overall Course Rating" and "Overall Professor Rating," are the two main forms of numerical assessment presented on this website (in addition to a rating that assesses perceived difficulty). For each course, our numbers represent the averaged ratings of the students who returned their course evaluations. The ratings for courses with a return rate of less than fifty percent are probably not reliable, so be sure to check out the "Return Rate" column on each page of statistics. Please also keep in mind that the numbers are translations of the qualitative responses that are given on the original evalution forms: thus, our rating of 0.00 corresponds a student evaluation of "Poor," 1.00 corresponds to an evaluation of "Fair," 2.00 to "Good," 3.00 to "Very Good," and 4.00 to "Excellent."

The History and Future of the Penn Course Review

The Penn Course Review was first published by the Daily Pennsylvanian in 1959 as a 33-page pamphlet that provided the only student-written descriptions of courses at the undergraduate level. At once popular, it was published every year and rapidly became known as the “course bible,” full of frank opinions and advice on how students really felt about certain courses and professors. The full range of student responses were culled from returned course evaluations, which contained questions on the quality of the course, its difficulty, the value of the assigned readings and the instructor's teaching skills and competence in the subject. In 1971 the Student Committee on Undergraduate Education took control of the publication and produced it for the next 11 years before handing it over to an autonomous organization known aptly as the Course Review. In 1985, due to a shortage of staff members, the Penn Course Review was not published. The Undergraduate Assembly responded in 1986 to student concern over the book's disappearance by funding its publication for the next three years. With this push, the guide grew in size and started selling in the Penn bookstore in 1989, where as of 2001, it cost $12.95 an issue.*

Although in 2002 the Penn Course Review developed a web-based version in an attempt to make the review free and accessible to all students, only about 200 individual course reviews were ever posted. Starting at the beginning of this school year the Undergraduate Assembly and the Student Committee on Undergraduate Education jointly announced their plan to revive the Penn Course Review and have it complete and available online by the end of the school year. This unique collaboration between two branches of student government has been aided by the efforts of two students in the School of Engineering and Applied Science, Howie Vegter and Steve MacCrory, who have made the PCR website their senior design project.

Right now the Penn Course Review is building a strong staff that will ensure the continuing success and survival of this important resource. Currently governed by an executive board that includes members from SCUE and the UA, the Review also has a separate board of divisional editors in place. It is indeed exciting that this vibrant yearly publication is finally where it should be: online and available to all.

Daily Pennsylvanian Articles about the Penn Course Review:

COLUMN: Grades for teaching assistants (10/16/1997):
http://www.dailypennsylvanian.com/vnews/display.v/ART/3adb23e1651d2

Curdled goat milk and the need for honesty (3/28/2001):
http://www.dailypennsylvanian.com/vnews/display.v/ART/3af973692dfa3

Perspective: The search for the perfect class (10/1/2002):
http://www.dailypennsylvanian.com/vnews/display.v/ART/3d9983adb9ddd

Julia Gottlieb: More than a few laughs (10/2/2002):
http://www.dailypennsylvanian.com/vnews/display.v/ART/3d9ad02a67a31

Course Review's future unclear (9/15/2003):
http://www.dailypennsylvanian.com/vnews/display.v/ART/3f655fca76e68

Letter to the Editor by a former Business Manager of the PCR (9/19/2003):
http://www.dailypennsylvanian.com/vnews/display.v/ART/3f6ac6ce987d2

Student groups agree to rehabilitate Course Review (9/22/2003):
http://www.dailypennsylvanian.com/vnews/display.v/ART/3f6eacb54c2f5

New Course Review site up despite kinks (10/28/2003):
http://www.dailypennsylvanian.com/vnews/display.v/ART/3f9e4c88ccd82

Staff Editorial: Welcoming back the Course Review (10/28/2003):
http://www.dailypennsylvanian.com/vnews/display.v/ART/3f9e5403bc286

Improved Course Review Web site aids students (3/25/2004):
http://www.dailypennsylvanian.com/vnews/display.v/ART/4062904f8a564

The Penn Course Review Executive Board:

Editor in Chief
Erica Miao

Web Administrators
Alex Chavez
Erica Ehrlich

Marketing Chair
Jason Bortz

Treasurer
Jason Bortz

SCUE Liaisons
Samantha Springer
Michael Sheehan

UA Liaisons
Cynthia Wong
Michael Cohen

Divisional Editors:

Humanities:
Vicki Litvinov
Shannon Meyerhoff

Math, Science, and Engineering:
Dominique Low
Esther Hsieh

Social Sciences:
Eli Hoffman
Sarah Gudis

Arts and Nursing:
Ruth McAdams
Rebecca Beyer

Wharton:
Charlene Chen
David Dubbert

Editors-At-Large:
Jason Bortz
Guadalupe de los Santos

Last updated June 23, 2004